BarrierFormer: Transformer-Guided Predictive Barrier Enforcement for Safe Robot Control

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Control barrier functions (CBFs) have become one of the most popular tools for encoding and enforcing state constraints in safety-critical robotics. Standard CBF approaches are inherently myopic in nature as they enforce safety only at the current time step. Consequently, the system can be driven toward the boundary of the safe set where no feasible safe control exists at a future timestep. Model predictive control (MPC) based approaches address this by enforcing state constraints over a receding horizon. However, such approaches generally require the model to be known for solving a constrained optimization problem at every step, which is computationally expensive for real-time deployment. We propose BarrierFormer, a barrier-supervised transformer framework that addresses these limitations by encoding rollout-level CBF constraints in learning a model-free safe policy. A causal transformer encodes observation-action history, autoregressively generates a predictive rollout through the dynamics head to replace the model, and provides a residual correction to a nominal controller through the action head to replace the online computation. A barrier critic operating on local observations evaluates CBF constraint violations along this rollout, and a safety teacher computes barrier-consistent actions satisfying these constraints as direct supervision targets for the learned control policy. During inference, the policy maps observation-action history to control actions without any online optimization or model knowledge, enabling real-time model-free predictive safety enforcement. Evaluations across linear and nonlinear, 2D and 3D dynamical systems for safe goal-directed navigation demonstrate that BarrierFormer outperforms existing reinforcement learning (RL)-based, diffusion-based, MPC-based, and transformer-based approaches in safety rate and inference latency.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments