Robotics paper index
Learning Reflexive Behavior for Contact-Rich Manipulation
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on Learning Reflexive Behavior for Contact-Rich Manipulation.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
During contact-rich manipulation, interactions between a robot and its environment carry information about local geometry: a surface prevents penetration, a bore guides a peg. A controller that exploits these interactions can comply with environmental constraints while preserving task intent. Robot-earning systems commonly use position, hybrid force-position, or Cartesian impedance control. Their prescribed tracking objectives, stiffness, or force-control directions may not match local constraints and may degrade performance. We learn a proprioceptive reflex policy in simulation on three simple interaction primitives: a spring, a plane, and a rail. The policy maps task-space commands to joint-position targets using state history, without direct force or geometrical measurements. Once trained, it serves as a frozen execution layer beneath higher-level controllers. We evaluate it in dual-arm box lifting, peg insertion, and surface following. In box lifting, the reflex kept the force below the threshold while the baseline failed. In rough-surface following it stayed below the 10 N reference, on par with tuned hybrid force-position control. In 0.02 mm peg insertion It reduced mean estimated contact force to less than half that of the baseline while increasing hardware success rates from at most 22 % to 36-58 %. By separating contact response from command generation, the reflex policy provides motion planners, learned policies, and teleoperators with robust contact-rich execution.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments